Moo 03-10-10
Many of us will be using Spring Break to revise, rethink, and rework various aspects of our projects. Some of the main talking points were:
1. Who benefits from evaluations the most?
-sponsors
-the grant writer(s)
-the organization (submitting the proposal)
-target audiences
-future grant proposals (old ones are the basis for new ones per Rich)
2. "evaluation is rhetorical"-Rich
3. formative (w/information and details) vs. summative (summarizes effectiveness) evaluation plans
4. implementation of Gantt Charts- to record, evaluate, and manage project progression and established expectations
5. Bea pointed out, "two sets of measurements"-
a.) getting funded and b.) implementing the project
6. evaluations have both monetary and time-consuming costs involved
7. Brett recommends a formative evaluation method with G.O.T (goals/objectives/tasks)
8. Rich agreed with G.O.T. and likened the "genre" to the basic grant writing process (i.e. problem--->solution--->funder's role in solution)
9. data reporting/data dissemination should be included in the 'evaluation process' and in the 'budget'; thus demonstrating that we, the writers, have "thought it through'
10. goals/objectives must be revised and measurable so that data can be measured, collected, and analyzed
11. sustainability (p.280) is important because:
-shows seriousness
-shows project can continue when their (funder's) money runs out
-plans for and keeps project momentum
12. sustainability- Which project can take the money the furthest?
(i.e. The most bang for your buck)
13. types of sustainability:
-financial
-managerial
-technical
-environmental
-social
14. B.I.O.R.- if you have style/typographical differences with participants and want to push the issue, then BIOR!
(Blame It On Rich) :)
15. our nation, on average, hates large blocks of uninterrupted words
16. Rich said, "just remember how cool I am on evaluations"
17. Spring Break jumped out of no where and started early!
No comments:
Post a Comment