I will not recount the details of his work given that we completed the assignment recently, but I will, instead, review the implications his work has on mine. As you will recall, he uses the typical medical student as an example, since the same constructivist-based, PBL theory has been utilized in medical training since the 1950's. I believe newer works (e.g. Norton), place the inception much earlier in time. In such collaborative learning environments, a problem, or patient case, is worked up, discussed, analyzed, and solved in small groups. If Bruffee's assertion that many students and faculty place a paramount importance on "class discussion" and regard it as one of the most effective teaching tools, then the value of concentrated collaboration via small groups is easily accepted. This somewhat abnormal discourse can take place at lunch, in elevators, in hallways, and at medical dorm rooms, owing to the fact that rules, as Bruffee says, are set aside. Abnormal discourse can not be taught, but it is this same abnormal discourse that is "necessary to [normal] learning."
My work is an extension of such a premise, the value of collaborative group exchange can be more focused with fewer people. Hence, small rotational medical student groups are easier to work in that a class numbering ninety. After formal, and "normal", learning formats cease to exist in the post-graduate era of one's professional career, even smaller and more informal knowledge communities are utilized. The ubiquitous acceptance of mobile technology, coupled with the simple establishment of peer-to-peer social networks, which is to say one-on-one conversations, easily facilitates quick, self-directed, and multi-directional knowledge transfer. Whether by design, necessity, or 'just because we can' motivation, medicine has developed, and will continue to design, new pedagogical teaching and learning platforms. Bruffee's article was written 26 years before the iPad's release, yet his work is still important to our understanding of collaborative learning and technology's facilitation of those evolutionary tendencies. With professor approval, and a formal proposal, I will expand on this brief introduction for my course project!
RB
Rich, I totally agree. Collaborative learning is a significant step in student learning. Our entire science department uses it for almost ALL their courses, even their general education courses. While reading Bruffee, I couldn't help but picture our physics instructor's students huddled around one of his problems, exploring their own ideas about what happened in the experiment they just witnessed.
ReplyDeleteA lot of our new instructors, including our adjuncts, have to be indoctrinated into this pedagogy. It feels unnatural to them for a few semesters, but they see the results.
Your project sounds very interesting!
Hi, Rich...
ReplyDeleteCollaborative learning is an interesting "trend" (if we can call anything that's been around for so many decades as a trend). It does present a few challenges, though. In a collaborative environment, I believe there must also be mutual respect among the participants...respect for subject matter expertise/knowledge, respect for effort/involvement, etc. And there must also be one more thing, and that's a common goal. The difficulty lies in that students are individually competing for marks...but now we put them in a group setting where the group must reach a common goal but individual effort is difficult to ascertain. I'm really looking forward to hearing more about your project in the weeks to come.